首页> 外文OA文献 >Poverty and Proximate Barriers to Learning: Vision Deficiencies, Vision Correction and Educational Outcomes in Rural Northwest China
【2h】

Poverty and Proximate Barriers to Learning: Vision Deficiencies, Vision Correction and Educational Outcomes in Rural Northwest China

机译:贫困和最接近的学习障碍:西北农村地区的视力缺陷,视力矫正和教育成果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Few studies of educational barriers in developing countries have investigated the role of children’s vision problems, despite the self-evident challenge that poor vision poses to classroom learning and the potential for a simple ameliorative intervention. We address this gap with an analysis of two datasets from Gansu Province, a highly impoverished province in northwest China. One dataset is the Gansu Survey of Children and Families (GSCF, 2000 and 2004), a panel survey of 2,000 children in 100 rural villages; the other is the Gansu Vision Intervention Project (GVIP, 2004), a randomized trial involving 19,185 students in 165 schools in two counties. Results attest to significant unmet need for vision correction. About 11 percent of third to fifth graders in the GVIP and about 17 percent of 13 to 16 year olds in the GSCF had diagnosed vision problems. Yet, just 1 percent of the GVIP sample and 7 percent of the GSCF sample wore glasses in 2004, and access to vision correction shows a sharp socioeconomic gradient in both datasets. Importantly, vision problems themselves are actually selective of higher socioeconomic status children and more academically engaged students, a finding that poses challenges to isolating the causal impact of glasses-wearing. Propensity score matching estimates based on the GSCF suggest a significant effect of glasses-wearing on standardized math and literacy tests, though not on language tests. Analysis of the GVIP intervention shows that those who received glasses were less likely to fail a class. While we cannot firmly rule out all sources of selectivity, findings are consistent with the commonsense notion that correcting vision supports learning. The high level of unmet need for vision correction, together with evidence suggesting that wearing glasses supports learning, indicates the potential value of this simple intervention for students in developing country settings. The selectivity issues involved in the analysis indicate the need for further empirical studies that test the impact of vision correction on learning.
机译:尽管缺乏视力对课堂学习构成挑战,并且有可能采取简单的改善干预措施,这是不言而喻的挑战,但在发展中国家,很少有研究针对儿童视力问题的作用进行过调查。我们通过分析甘肃省的两个数据集来解决这一差距,甘肃省是中国西北部的一个极度贫困的省。其中一个数据集是《甘肃省儿童和家庭调查》(GSCF,2000年和2004年),该调查是对100个乡村的2,000名儿童的面板调查。另一个是甘肃视觉干预项目(GVIP,2004),是一项随机试验,涉及两个县165所学校的19185名学生。结果证明,视力矫正的大量未满足需求。 GVIP的三至五年级学生中约有11%,GSCF的13至16岁学生中约有17%已诊断出视力问题。然而,2004年,仅GVIP样本的1%和GSCF样本的7%戴了眼镜,并且在两个数据集中使用视力矫正显示出明显的社会经济梯度。重要的是,视力问题本身实际上是社会经济地位较高的孩子和学习程度更高的学生的选择,这一发现对隔离戴眼镜的因果影响提出了挑战。根据GSCF得出的倾向得分匹配估计值表明,配戴眼镜对标准化数学和素养测验有显着影响,但对语言测验却没有影响。对GVIP干预的分析表明,接受眼镜的人上课失败的可能性较小。尽管我们不能完全排除选择性的所有来源,但发现与矫正视力支持学习的常识相一致。视力矫正的高度未满足需求,以及表明戴眼镜有助于学习的证据,表明这种简单干预对发展中国家学生的潜在价值。分析中涉及的选择性问题表明需要进一步的经验研究,以测试视力矫正对学习的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号